Texas on Short List for Fracking-Induced Earthquakes

4.0 Quake Hits North Texas
New Maps Plot Texas Earthquake Risk

New maps outline the threat of potential human-induced earthquakes in Texas.

Related: Fracking Rules Tightened in North Texas

Until a few short years ago, earthquakes in Texas were virtually non-existent. But since 2008 there has been an increase in seismic activity, leaving many to wonder whether they are a direct result of oil and gas activity in the region.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is adding more fuel to the debate with a recently released forecast for 2016 that include maps identifying potential seismic events from both human-induced and natural earthquakes.

This is the first time that these maps have added the human-induced competent, with wastewater disposal from fracking considered to be the primary cause.

By including human-induced events, our assessment of earthquake hazards has significantly increased in parts of the U.S.,” said Mark Petersen, Chief of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. “This research also shows that much more of the nation faces a significant chance of having damaging earthquakes over the next year, whether natural or human-induced.

The maps show that the most significant hazards from induced seismicity are in Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Colorado, New Mexico and Arkansas. The Eagle Ford shows a less than 1% chance of any type of seismic activity, either manmade or natural.

Last year, SMU released a study that concluded oil and gas operations are causing the tremors that began rattling the North Texas towns of Azle and Reno. and, just last week, the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers tightened fracking regulations near a North Texas Dam over concerns that the dam might be in danger.

Even under a mountain of evidence, the Texas Railroad Commission continues to be skeptical of the link between fracking and earthquakes and has publicly questioned the mounting scientific evidence of the link.

Read more at usgs.gov

Fracking Facts: Is Our Water Supply at Risk?

Fracking Conserves Water

In the debate against fracking and its impacts on the environment, there have been many concerns raised about the amount of water used in the fracking process and the potential danger to the depletion of our nation’s water supply.

Related: Fracking Facts: Cleaner Than Coal

But...is fracking actually using more water than the production of other energy sources?

Fracking vs. Other Conventional Extraction Methods

Before a power supply  can be processed for energy use, it has to be mined or extracted from the earth. Every type of conventional energy source uses water in its extraction method, with fracking using less than the others.

  • Coal: According the Department of Energy, mining coal takes a minimum 230 trillion gallons of water a year.
  • Fracking Oil and Gas: In comparison to coal, between 2009-2014, only 240 billion gallons of water were used in fracking operations across the country.
  • One example is that electric generation in Pennsylvania's Susquehanna River Basin uses nearly 150 million gallons a day in the, while the projected total demand for peak Marcellus Shale activity in the same area is 8.4 million gallons per day.

Setting up a fracking well can take up to two times the amount of water than a conventional oil well, but research shows that fracked wells produce significantly less waste, making it a better alternative for the environment, especially over the lifetime of the well.

All together, the amount of water used in fracking is estimated to be at .87% of the total industrial water used and .04% of the total freshwater in the United States (Duke University). The area of the United States that consumes the most water in it’s active shale plays is Texas, however a recent study done by the University of Texas states, “ hydraulic fracturing is actually helping to shield Texas from water shortages because it is allowing the state to move away from using more water intensive energy resources.”

The Processing of Natural Gas vs. Other Energy Sources

After extracting the resource, it has to be refined and turned into electricity, and again the use of natural gas (as a direct result of fracking) uses significantly less water than other sources. The following table shows the amount of water used to generate electricity from the top three current energy sources:

fracking water
fracking water

Environmentalists are quick to point to the superior choice of solar or thermal energy, but it is unlikely that those sources will ever be able to provide enough energy to quench our national thirst. Natural gas, acquired through fracking,  is quickly rising to the top of the playing field as an environmentally safe and economical alternative to less desirable sources.

From a 2015 study done by Stanford University, “Fracking’s impact on both climate change and local air pollution is similar to its impact on water...Unconventional energy generates income and, done well, can reduce air pollution and even water use compared with other fossil fuels.

Fracking Rules Tightened in North Texas

4.0 Quake Hits North Texas
Fracking Blocked Due to Seismic Fear

The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) have tightened fracking regulations near a North Texas Dam, becoming the latest agency at odds with the Texas Railroad Commission.

Related: RRC: XTO Energy Not Responsible for Earthquakes

USACE have added their voice to concerns over the proximity of oil and gas activity in order to protect the Joe Pool Lake dam. Through a multiyear engineering study, the corp took a look at the 20-year standard used for the barrier for drilling and what impact fracking might have on the integrity of the dam.

The study reads, “...It was concluded that the 3,000 foot exclusion zone at the project does not meet agency tolerable risk guidelines and, as a result, puts the project and public at risk. As a result, USACE has adopted a 4,000 foot exclusion zone at Joe Pool Dam within which no drilling will be allowed, regardless of depth. Additionally, in order to protect the project from seismicity, USACE will work to limit injection wells within five miles of the project.

This study has the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC), which regulates oil and gas activity in the state, standing alone in its stance over the relationship between fracking and earthquakes. The RRC has long been skeptical of the link between fracking and earthquakes and has publicly questioned the mounting scientific evidence of the link.

One major study was published last April by researchers at SMU and confirmed that oil and gas disposal wells were likely to blame for a series of earthquakes in Azle and Reno Texas.

I have not reached the conclusion that oil and gas activity is the causal factor. While we remain concerned about seismic activity in the state, we still haven’t had a hearing where we’ve had a definite case made that a specific operator is associated with any specific earthquake activity.
— RRC seismologist

 

Currently, there is no drilling activity underway near the dam, but XTO Energy has three existing wells and permits to drill four more.

Read the full report at swf.usace.army.mil

Eagle Ford Shale: the View from Space

eagle ford shale NASA
eagle ford shale NASA

New images from NASA chronicle the evolution of the Eagle Ford landscape.

Related: Eagle Ford Shale From Space - Updated NASA Photo

For many years, NASA has been using satellites to capture views of the Eagle Ford Shale from high above the earth. In February, they released new images that show the growth of the region and the total transformation of the landscape in just a few years.

In nighttime satellite imagery, the light from the Eagle Ford shale play competes with the nearby cities of San Antonio and Austin. The electric glow of drilling equipment, worker camps, and other gas and oil infrastructure combine with flickering gas flares to create an unmistakable arc of light across southern Texas.

The following images show the area east of Cotulla, Texas, in the heart of the Eagle Ford. During the boom, Cotulla's population grew from about 4,000 to 10,000.

Cotulla, TX: 2000
Cotulla, TX: 2015 | click to enlarge

The current downturn has affected the rig count in the Eagle Ford as producers wait out low crude prices, but the long term affects are yet to be known.

Read more at earthobservatory.nasa.gov

Eagle Ford Rig Count Back to 48

Eagle Ford Rig Count
Eagle Ford Rig Counts

The Eagle Ford Shale rig count increased by one, ending the week with 48 rigs running across our coverage area by midday Friday.

In recent Eagle Ford news, the number of lawsuits in the region have increased with the drop in crude prices. Texas courts are seeing everything from royalty, lease and title complaints to more complicated contract disputes involving major investors.

Read more:Eagle Ford County Roads a Mess

A total of 450 oil and gas rigs were running across the United States this week, which is a drop of 14 over last week. 88 were targeting natural gas (four less than the previous week) and 362 were targeting oil in the U.S. (10 less than the previous week). The remainder were drilling service wells (e.g. disposal wells, injection wells, etc.)204 of the rigs active in the U.S. were running in Texas.

Baker Hughes reports its own Eagle Ford Rig Count that covers the 14 core counties. The rig count published on EagleFordShale.com includes a 30 county area impacted by Eagle Ford development. A full list of the counties included can be found in the table below.

Eagle Ford Oil & Gas Rigs

Natural gas rigs increased in the Eagle Ford fell to three this week as natural gas prices improved slightly, trading at $1.96/mmbtu, a $.15 increase from the previous week.

The Eagle Ford saw an increase in running oil rigs up this week to 45 with WTI oil prices ending the week at $36.79, a decrease of $2.67 over last week. A total of 43 rigs are drilling horizontal wells, zero are drilling directional wells, and five are vertical rigs.

Karnes County continues to lead the region in development with 11 running rigs. See the full list below in the Eagle Ford Shale Drilling by County below.

Eagle Ford Shale Drilling by County

Eagle Ford Shale News

Karnes County Couple Petitions Texas Supreme Court

Mineral Litigation Surges in Texas

Eagle Ford School Districts Give Back Millions

What is the Rig Count?

The Eagle Ford Shale Rig Count is an index of the total number of oil & gas drilling rigs running across a 30 county area in South Texas. The South Texas rigs referred to in this article are for ALL drilling reported by Baker Hughes and not solely wells targeting the Eagle Ford formation. All land rigs and onshore rig data shown here are based upon industry estimates provided by the Baker Hughes Rig Count.

Read more at bakerhughes.com